Selasa, 18 Februari 2025

Andri Elyus Luntungan Tersentuh Adanya Bantuan Dunia Bagi Orang Rentan Miskin Dikurangi



 Intternational . Andri Elyus luntungan mengatakan jika pada saatnya bantuan bagi orag miskin dan yang renatan kondisi ekonominya sebut mudah rapuh disana mereka tidak lagi teresentuh oleh bantuan bagi negara donor hal ini sebut presden buruk, dan bisa dikatakan dapat menimbulkan Krisis berkepanjangan bagi mereka yang seharusnya dapat menerima segala bantuan itu. Seharusnya sebelum hal itu berlaku para pakar kemanusiaan yang melihat keadaan warga dunia sebut sedang terkena Krisis, setidaknya dapat mencegah seperti itu terjadi, artinya, agar dapat adanya sebuah kebersamaan meningkatnya taraf hidup bagi warga yang hidup didunia disini perlu kesadaran tinggi demi kemanusia yang sejajar kehidupannya, setidaknya perlu seluruh yang merasa memiliki kas besar didalam negaranya segera membuang uangnya kepada negara - negara yang membutuhkan,! hal ini perlu dilakukan demi pemulihan perkembangan ekonomi dunia sekaligus dapat mengurangi standar hidup manusia termajinalkan dari sesama manusia, artinya landasan hidup manusia seharusnya harus sesuai dengan Pedoman Sang Pencipta Kasihilah sesamamu seperti kamu mengasihi dirimu sendiri. Dari landasan inilah setidaknya bagi mereka yang asli manusia dan paham betul mereka diluar sana adalah saudara kita apa salahnya jika bagi negara yang kas dalam negaranya bisa membuang uangnya untuk membantu kepada negara yang membutuhkan. dengan kata lain hidup sebagai manusia jika sadar perlu banyak berbuat kebaikan setidaknya malu jika hanya dirinya saja merasa perlu terkenal sementara membiarkan negara lain merana menderita dengan keadaan dipenuhi derita.Maaf jika anda asli mengaku sebagai manusia sempurna, mana mungkin membiarkan manusia lainnya menderita. lain jika jika anda bukan manusia, wajar jika berbuat seperti itu.!?. artinya jika anda manusia asli mana tega berbuat seperti itu. Ini logika saya. cetus andari elyus luntungan Pengamat International. saat dihubungi memalui HP dimintai tanggapannya ada dugaan dana kemanuasiaan akan dipotong.

Andri juga menagatkan-PBB baru mampu mengumpulkan dana sekitar 60 persen dari 307 juta orang yang diperkirakan akan membutuhkan bantuan kemanusiaan tahun depan. Artinya, 117 juta orang tidak akan mendapatkan makanan atau bantuan lainnya pada 2025.

Jumlah orang yang kelaparan atau mengalami kesulitan hidup di seluruh dunia terus meningkat, sementara jumlah dana yang disumbangkan oleh negara-negara terkaya di dunia untuk membantu mereka terus menurun.

Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB) mengatakan saat ini mereka hanya mampu mengumpulkan cukup uang untuk membantu sekitar 60 persen dari 307 juta orang yang diperkirakan akan membutuhkan bantuan kemanusiaan tahun depan. Itu berarti setidaknya 117 juta orang tidak akan mendapatkan makanan atau bantuan lainnya pada 2025.PBB juga akan menutup 2024 dengan hanya mengumpulkan sekitar 46 persen dari $49,6 miliar yang diupayakannya untuk bantuan kemanusiaan di seluruh dunia.



Ini adalah tahun kedua berturut-turut badan dunia itu hanya mengumpulkan kurang dari separuh anggaran yang diminta. Kekurangan anggaran ini telah memaksa badan-badan kemanusiaan untuk membuat keputusan yang menyiksa, seperti memangkas jatah makan bagi mereka yang kelaparan dan mengurangi jumlah orang yang memenuhi syarat untuk mendapatkan bantuan.

Anggaran Minim

Asisten Direktur Eksekutif Untuk Kemitraan dan Mobilisasi Sumber Daya Program Pangan Dunia (World Food Program/WFP), Rania Dagash-Kamara, mengatakan konsekuensinya dirasakan di tempat-tempat seperti Suriah. WFP, yang merupakan distributor makanan utama PBB, kini hanya dapat memberi makan satu juta orang. Padahal biasanya mereka bisa memberi makan hingga enam juta orang.Dagash-Kamara, yang mengunjungi staf WFP di Suriah pada Maret lalu, mengatakan “Kalimat mereka adalah saat ini 'kami mengambil dari orang yang kelaparan untuk memberi makan mereka yang kelaparan,'" katanya dalam sebuah wawancara.

Para pejabat PBB tidak melihat adanya alasan untuk dapat bersikap optimis saat konflik, kerusuhan politik, dan cuaca ekstrem terus meluas; faktor-faktor yang memicu kelaparan.

“Kami terpaksa mengurangi permohonan bantuan kepada mereka yang paling membutuhkan,” kata Tom Fletcher, wakil sekretaris jenderal PBB untuk urusan kemanusiaan dan koordinator bantuan darurat,  ini yang sempat saya dengar itu dari berbagai nara suber. jika seperti ini adanya setidaknya bisa dibayangkan berapa yang akan tidak menerima bantuan.!?. mendengar semua itu saya sebagai pengamat tersentuh dan sangat menyayangkan mengapa hal itu dapat terjadi dan menimpah bagi warga dunia yang miskin.!?. menedengar hal ini saya menghimbau kepada seluruh negara yang merasa memiliki Kas dalam negaranya besar bisa mengubah hal itu agar tidak perlu diberlakukan dan perlu di bahas ulang. jika perlu seluruh anggota yang ada didalam ruangan UN PBB dapat memberikan saran untuk menolak diberlakukannya pemotongan dana bantuan  itu, jika perlu bertambah bukan justru berkurang demi menyelamatkan bagi orang miskin diseluruh dunia. Cetus Andri Elyus Luntungan pada online.

 andri juga mengatakan. Pesan Tuhan Sangat terang benderang Kasihilah sesamamu seperti kamu mengasihi dirimu sendiri. Artinya selagi kamu banyak uang dan asli ingin disebut manusia sempurna setidaknya jangan pernah melawan yang dikehendaki Tuhan. Artinya jika sudah meninggal mana mungkin bisa berbuat kebaikan. yang jelas mumpung hidup jadikan dirimu hanya menujukan kebaikan dihadapan Tuhan agar upahmu besar didalamkerjaan surga. hanya ini yang dapat saya katakan. demikian andri elyus luntungan mengahir perkataannya. ( Dhont Boscho Amerika.)

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar

Desain Andri

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform | TheHill

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform

The latest Employment Situation report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows weekly employee earnings have grown $75 since tax reform passed, well short of the $4,000 to $9,000 annual increases projected by President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE and House Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanTrump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Sunday shows preview: White House officials talk Syria strike Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform MORE (R-Wis.).  

During the three months following passage of the tax bill, the average American saw a $6.21 increase in average weekly earnings. Assuming 12 weeks of work during the three months following passage of the corporate tax cuts, this equates to a $75 increase.

Assuming a full 52 weeks of work, the $6.21 increase in weekly earnings would result in a $323 annual increase, nowhere near the minimum $4,000 promised and $9,000 potential annual increases projected by President Trump and Speaker Ryan if significant cuts were made to corporate tax rates.

Unless something drastically changes, it seems that Americans are going to have to settle for much less than the $4,000 to $9,000 projected wage increases. An extra $322 a year isn’t going to do much to pay down the $1 trillion in additional debt they are projected to take on as a result of the tax cuts.

Yet, a key part of the argument for the recently passed corporate tax cuts and more than a trillion dollars in debt was the substantial wage hike promised by the president’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA).

From a document titled, “Corporate Tax Reform and Wages: Theory and Evidence,” on the White House’s website:

“Reducing the statutory federal corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent would, the analysis below suggests, increase average household income in the United States by, very conservatively, $4,000 annually.”

The document goes on to say:

“When we use the more optimistic estimates from the literature, wage boosts are over $9,000 for the average U.S. household.”

No less than Speaker Ryan’s website trumpeted the Council of Economic Advisers report claiming that on average, the proposed corporate tax cuts would result in at least a $4,000 annual increase in wages.

Now, some supporters of the tax bill may say this analysis is unfair because it is too early for the effects of the tax bill to show up in wages. By that logic, they also shouldn’t take credit for reported employment growth increases.  

Still others may point to the $1,000 bonuses announced by some companies shortly after passage of the tax bill. First, that is significantly less than the promised $4,000 to $9,000. Second, these are not wage increases; these are one-time bonuses.

Will companies pay them again, and if so when? Third, the $1,000 represents a fraction of the estimated potential company tax savings.

Using 2016 net income, 2016 effective tax rates, the new 21-percent corporate tax rate and company bonuses, we estimated company bonuses as a percentage of a number of company’s potential tax savings. The results: In many cases, the bonuses represent a mere pittance of the possible tax savings.

Navient announced that it would be giving $1,000 bonuses to 98 percent of its 6,7000 employees, paying out nearly $7 million in bonuses. While that may seem generous, it pales in comparison to Navient’s potential tax savings.

Using Navient’s 2016 net income, its 2016 effective tax rate, estimated annual tax savings of nearly $200 million and its announced bonuses, we calculated that the announced bonuses represent less than 4 percent of Navient’s potential tax savings.

Turning to the airline industry, JetBlue’s employees might be feeling blue if they realized that their $1,000 bonuses are estimated to be less than 10 percent of JetBlue’s potential tax savings, while American Airlines’ bonuses are estimated to represent less than 15 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings

Not to be outdone, Comcast’s bonuses represent less than 8 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings, while Walmart appears downright generous, giving an estimated $0.16 of every dollar of its estimated potential annual tax savings to employees in the form of bonuses.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic 

Source: Solutionomics

What happened to the minimum $4,000 promised? I guess like many promises by politicians, they were empty. Instead, they seem to have gone to share buybacks. For the period December 2017 through February 2018, share buybacks more than doubled to $200 million.

Is a $323 wage increase and a one-time bonus of $1,000 that represents a fraction of estimated potential company tax savings worth the more than $1 trillion in additional debt placed on Americans? Is this the best Congress could do? No.

Instead, Congress could have simply made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company increasing wages. The problem is that some companies receiving tax cuts didn’t raise wages.

If Congress had made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company’s wage increases, the American people would have gotten more bang for their tax cut bucks. Additionally, this would have created a real incentive for companies to raise wages: Increase wages, get a tax cut; don’t and you won’t.

If the justification for saddling the American people with at least $1 trillion in additional debt was greater wage growth, tax cuts should have been tied to each company’s wage growth; that’s just logical. That’s getting a better deal for the American people, and that’s getting a better return on investment.

Chris Macke is the founder of Solutionomics, a think tank focused on developing solutions for a more efficient, merit-based corporate tax code. He has advised the U.S. Federal Reserve by providing market updates and implications of monetary policy changes on asset valuations and market distortions, and he's a contributor to the Fed Beige Book. Find him on Twitter: @solutionomics.

Load Comments (984)
 

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France declassified a report on Saturday laying out evidence that officials said proves that a chemical attack in Syria last week was carried out by the government of President Bashar Assad.

The report claims that several chemical strikes were carried out in the Damascus suburb of Douma on April 7, and that symptoms experienced by the victims — skin burns, suffocation and other breathing difficulties, among other markers — were consistent with the effects of chlorine gas.

"Reliable intelligence indicates that Syrian military officials have coordinated what appears to be the use of chemical weapons containing chlorine on Douma, on April 7," the report, released by the French Foreign Ministry, reads.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report also states that the Syrian government has carried out a number of chemical weapons strikes since April 4, 2017 — the same day a chemical attack in Syria's northern Idlib province left more than 80 civilians dead.

The U.S. issued an assessment on Friday night pointing to the Syrian government's role in the alleged chemical attacks in Douma.

That report cites "multiple media sources, the reported symptoms experienced by victims, videos and images showing two assessed barrel bombs from the attack, and reliable information indicating coordination between Syrian military officials before the attack."

The assessment also suggests that the Syrian government not only used chlorine in the attack on Douma, but that reported symptoms were also consistent with exposure to sarin, a deadly nerve agent.

The French and U.S. assessments came hours after leaders in Washington, Paris and London authorized "precision strikes" on targets in Syria believed to be associated with the country's chemical weapons arsenal.

Syria and its allies, Russia and Iran, have denied that Assad's government used chemical weapons, and have sought to blame both foreign actors and militant groups for staging the attacks in Douma.

Russia has accused the U.S. and its allies of failing to produce adequate evidence of the Syrian government's role in the chemical attack.

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international chemical weapons watchdog, launched an investigation into the alleged chemical strikes on Douma on Saturday.

The allied strikes on Friday were cast by U.S. officials, not as a punishment for Assad's government, but as a means to eradicate Syria's chemical stockpile and production capabilities.

Lt. Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, the director of the Joint Staff, said Saturday that while the allied attacks dealt a blow to Syria's chemical weapons program, Damascus likely retained "residual" elements of its chemical arsenal.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpInfowars' Alex Jones blasts Trump over airstrikes: 'He's crapping all over us' McCain to Trump: Airstrikes alone won't achieve objectives in Syria Top general: US did not notify Russia on Syria targets MORE and other U.S. officials have said that they are prepared to take further action in Syria, unless Assad's government ceases its alleged use of chemical weapons.

Load Comments (254)
 

Mueller can prove Cohen made secret trip to Prague before the election: report

Special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE’s team has proof that President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE’s personal lawyer made a secret trip to Prague during the 2016 campaign despite his denial that he'd ever been there, McClatchy reported Friday.

It is not clear why Michael Cohen was in Prague. The claim he visited was originally made in a dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

Cohen denied that he'd ever been to Prague "in my life" after the dossier's publication, tweeting a photo of his passport.

McClatchy reported that Cohen entered the country through Germany in August or early September 2016, which does not require a passport stamp.

The dossier claimed that, in Prague, Cohen met with a prominent ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Konstantin Kosachev, but it is not clear whether Mueller has evidence of such a meeting.

Koschahev was one of 24 Russian oligarchs slapped with U.S. sanctions earlier this month.

If such a meeting happened, it would be further evidence of ties between Trump associates and Putin. The dossier also claims that Cohen, among others, was deeply involved in a “cover up and damage limitation operation in the attempt to prevent the full details of Trump’s relationship with Russia being exposed.”

Neither Cohen nor Mueller commented on the story to McClatchy.

The report comes on the same day that U.S attorneys confirmed that they are investigating Cohen for criminal activity.

The FBI raided Cohen's office and home on Monday, in part on a referral from Mueller's office. 

 
Quantcast
France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks
READ NEXT: France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

Vedio

Desain G.

vik
Transformasi Wajah KRL

Transformasi Wajah KRL

Ribuan warga Jabodetabek mengandalkan kereta rel listrik (KRL) sebagai moda transportasi massal dalam aktivitas sehari-hari. Pelayanan KRL pun terus dibenahi seiring berjalannya waktu. Simak pembahasan lengkap tentang transformasi wajah KRL dari masa ke m
Hikayat Singkat

Hikayat Singkat

Lahan gambut di Indonesia menyimpan banyak “harta karun” yang salah satunya adalah energi. Namun, eksploitasi secara berlebihan pada lahan gambut akan mengakibatkan stok karbon yang berkurang.
MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017 sudah resmi dimulai! Setelah pada musim sebelumnya banyak momen menarik terjadi, pada tahun ini diyakini akan lebih seru lagi.
Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Refleksi atas warisan nilai Jakob Oetama yang mewarnai perjalanan jurnalisme Indonesia.

Berita Terkini