Minggu, 27 Oktober 2024

Oct 25 Andri Elyus Luntungan Mengatakan Ukraiina Mendapat Serangan Rusia Nato Dan Blog Barat Jangan Hanya Nonton Harus Ikut Turun Langsung Membela Ukraiina.

 


Internstionsl- nternational Jangan terlalu membiarkan keadaan Ukraiina  yang terus menerus mendapat serangan dari Rusia. Setidaknya Nato dan Blog barat yang memiliki harga diri tinggi. Melihat keadaan seperti apa kondisi Ukraiina yang boleh dibilang hampir terjepit selayaknya dengan cepat ikut serta buat membantu keadaan itu. Cetus andri Elyus Luntungan Pengamat International saat dimintai tanggapannya mengenai keadaan Ukraiina yang mendapat serangan dari Rusia itu.

Andri juga mengatakan-Perang bukanlah latihan akademis. Anda harus berjuang untuk menang atau berjuang untuk mati.

Dan Ukraina sedang berperang dengan musuh-musuh dunia bebas: Rusia dan kaki tangannya, Belarus, Iran, dan Korea Utara. Entah bagaimana, empat kediktatoran paling memalukanitu di Bumi meneror warga Ukraina dan menghancurkan negara bebas di tengah Eropa sementara sepertinya Barat hanya menonton dari pinggir lapangan.! Seharusnya " tidak seperti itu.?"

Lihat Kyiv telah menghabiskan lebih dari satu dekade untuk mempertahankan diri dari agresi Rusia. Moskow tidak dapat memenangkan perang.! Ia tidak memiliki sumber daya dan tenaga kerja yang dibutuhkan untuk menaklukkan seluruh Ukraina, apalagi untuk mengendalikannya. Demikian pula, Kyiv, yang dikutuk oleh geografi, tidak dapat mengakhiri perang tanpa jaminan keamanan yang membuat hampir mustahil bagi Rusia untuk menyerang Ukraina lagi di kemudian hari. Ini Yang perlu dilakukan oleh Barat. Cetus Andri.

Selanjutnya Andri juga menambahkan ,Meskipun pengembangan senjata nuklir Kyiv merupakan salah satu pilihan, cara terbaik untuk mencegah agresi Rusia lebih lanjut sambil mempertahankan hubungan positif Kyiv dengan Barat adalah melalui keanggotaan NATO.

Ukraina adalah nagian dari sukutu Nato. Rusia adala belum menjadi anggota nato . oleh sebab itu Secara moral, perlu sebut saja yang  sudah lama tertunda dan demi kepentingan Barat untuk mengundang pasukan terbesar dan paling tangguh di Eropa untuk bergabung dengan NATO, segera memberlakukan zona larangan terbang di atas wilayah Ukraina di sebelah barat Sungai Dnieper dan mengerahkan tentara dan sistem pertahanan udara untuk menegakkan komitmen tersebut.

Jika satu proyektil Rusia, Iran, atau Korea Utara yang diluncurkan dari Belarus atau Rusia mengenai wilayah Ukraina di sebelah barat Sungai Dnieper, dengan cepat di tanggapi dengan kekuatan yang sangat besar — ​​sehingga Rusia mengerti pesannya.

Ini akan menghalangi Rusia sekaligus mengurangi tekanan pada Ukraina dan Barat setidaknya dalam dua cara.

Pertama, dengan melindungi rakyat dan infrastruktur Ukraina. Karena Ukraina bagian barat menjadi lebih aman dan lebih stabil, hal ini kemungkinan akan mengurangi jumlah pengungsi yang menuju Eropa dan meningkatkan jumlah warga Ukraina yang kembali ke rumah.

Hal ini tidak hanya akan menghemat uang bagi Barat karena tidak perlu membangun kembali infrastruktur tersebut setelah perang, tetapi juga akan membuka ekonomi Ukraina dengan mengizinkan Kyiv untuk membuka kembali bandaranya di Ukraina bagian barat.

Kedua, jaminan keamanan ini juga akan memperkuat posisi Ukraina di medan perang, dan nisa sekaligus menuju, di meja perundingan.

Tidak hanya itu Secara logistik, hal itu akan dilakukan dengan memungkinkan Barat memproduksi senjata dan melatih tentara Ukraina di Ukraina bagian barat, bukan di Eropa dan Amerika. Secara militer, mudah dapat menahan Rusia  dengan mengizinkan penjaga perbatasan dan tentara Ukraina untuk mekan  mundu Rusia dari wilayah pinggiran dan dikerahkan ke garis depan di Kharkiv, Kherson, Zaporizhia, Donetsk, dan Luhansk, dimana itu bagian Ukraiina.!

Tidak hanya Barat harus tegas berbicara dalam bahasa musuh. Putin takut akan konsekuensi, bukan retorika. Ia menjadi berani karena keragu-raguan dan kelambanan, bukan karena proaktif. Keinginannya untuk melakukan eskalasi dan pengambilan risiko terkait dengan pencapaian atau penghindaran hasil potensial, bukan berdasarkan kepatuhan pada prinsip.

Jika Barat menaikkan taruhan dengan mengundang Ukraina untuk bergabung dengan NATO dan memberlakukan zona larangan terbang di Ukraina bagian barat, Rusia akan menyerah karena keragu-raguan, seperti yang terjadi ketika Evgeny Prighozin berbaris menuju Moskow, atau tidak melakukan apa pun, seperti ketika kita melewati semua yang disebut "garis merah" yang dibuat oleh Putin.

Meskipun pemerintah Rusia dan corongnya mengancam akan menyerang Barat dengan senjata nuklir, Rusia tidak mungkin menggunakan senjata nuklir dalam konflik di Ukraina. Pertama, aneksasi wilayah Ukraina — sebagian besar desa yang telah kehilangan penduduk dan hancur di Ukraina timur — tidak ada artinya bagi Federasi Rusia. Kedua, perang nuklir akan menjadi akhir bagi Putin, yang lebih mengutamakan pertahanan diri daripada apa pun.

Rusia kemungkinan besar akan mundur di Ukraina barat, sama seperti ketika AS memenangkan Pertempuran Conoco Fields melawan Grup Wagner pada tahun 2018 atau ketika Turki menembak jatuh jet tempur Rusia di Suriah.

Persoalannya Rusia  lagi mencari cara Bagaimanapun, Rusia berkepentingan untuk menghindari konfrontasi militer langsung dengan NATO — yang akan membuat tentara Rusia mengalami pukulan telak seumur hidup. Ini jika terjadi.!

Lihat saja -Barat sebenarnya adalah peradaban yang paling damai, makmur, dan progresif — dan aliansi militer paling kuat — dalam sejarah dunia.

Alih-alih bertindak seperti itu, Dan ada dugaan para pemimpin itu  menyerahkan inisiatif kepada Rusia, yang tidak lebih dari sekadar mafia dengan pom bensin dan senjata nuklir yang menyamar sebagai sebuah negara. Dan seperti semua mafia, Moskow akan mencairkan semua surat utangnya dan mengaktifkan setiap klien dan mitranya dalam upayanya untuk mempertahankan diri. Ini Fiksinya

Contohnya Hamas yang memberi Putin hadiah ulang tahun dengan menginvasi Israel pada 7 Oktober hingga pedagang senjata Rusia yang baru saja dibebaskan Victor Bout yang mempersenjatai Houthi di Yaman, burung-burung yang memiliki bulu yang sama selalu berkumpul bersama.!

Mereka tidak peduli dengan rakyatnya sendiri, apalagi dengan "kekhawatiran" atau "kecaman" Barat. Berorientasi pada hasil, mereka hanya peduli untuk menghindari dan mencapai hasil yang potensial. Dan prioritas utama mereka adalah tetap berkuasa.!? Mungkin seperti itu.

Sekutu Rusia Alexander Lukashenko, yang telah memerintah Belarus dengan tangan besi sebagai diktator terlama di Eropa dengan mencuri pemilu, membunuh ratusan warga sipilnya sendiri, dan memenjarakan. ini sangat menyayat pilu. cerus andri.

Andri juga menambahkan,Sekutu Rusia Nicolas Maduro, yang sempat ter isu seorang pengedar narkoba yang kalah dalam beberapa pemilihan umum, mengawasi keruntuhan ekonomi Venezuela dan membuat lebih dari 7,7 juta orang (seperempat dari populasi Venezuela) melarikan diri dari negaranya selama masa damai, masih berkuasa.

Rusia dan sekutunya menghargai pertahanan diri dan kelangsungan hidup rezim masing-masing di atas segalanya. Mereka didorong oleh rasa takut akan ditangkap, diadili, dan dieksekusi oleh orang-orang yang mereka teror selama beberapa dekade seperti yang dilakukan diktator Irak Saddam Hussein. Atau lebih buruk lagi, dibunuh di jalan dalam tindakan main hakim sendiri seperti yang dilakukan diktator Libya Muammar Gaddafi.

"Poros Kejahatan" yang dipimpin Rusia sayangnya menang. Mereka akan terus bersatu di masa mendatang. Barat harus melakukan hal yang sama dan lebih banyak lagi karena menyaksikan dari pinggir lapangan saat rezim paling represif di dunia menghancurkan Ukraina adalah hal yang menyedihkan.Artinya penanganan Putin. Dan hal ini harus segera perlu ditangani secara tegas dan penuh tanggung jawab

terkadang, kepemimpinan adalah tentang mengalahkan musuh Anda. Di lain waktu, ini tentang membantu teman-teman Anda di saat mereka membutuhkan. Jadi lakukan keduanya dengan mengundang Ukraina untuk bergabung dengan NATO dan memenangkan perdamaian di Eropa.Ini saran dari saya. demikian Andri Elyus Luntungan Pengamat International mengahiri perkataannya kepada online. (Redholve Rusia)

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar

Desain Andri

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform | TheHill

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform

The latest Employment Situation report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows weekly employee earnings have grown $75 since tax reform passed, well short of the $4,000 to $9,000 annual increases projected by President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE and House Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanTrump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Sunday shows preview: White House officials talk Syria strike Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform MORE (R-Wis.).  

During the three months following passage of the tax bill, the average American saw a $6.21 increase in average weekly earnings. Assuming 12 weeks of work during the three months following passage of the corporate tax cuts, this equates to a $75 increase.

Assuming a full 52 weeks of work, the $6.21 increase in weekly earnings would result in a $323 annual increase, nowhere near the minimum $4,000 promised and $9,000 potential annual increases projected by President Trump and Speaker Ryan if significant cuts were made to corporate tax rates.

Unless something drastically changes, it seems that Americans are going to have to settle for much less than the $4,000 to $9,000 projected wage increases. An extra $322 a year isn’t going to do much to pay down the $1 trillion in additional debt they are projected to take on as a result of the tax cuts.

Yet, a key part of the argument for the recently passed corporate tax cuts and more than a trillion dollars in debt was the substantial wage hike promised by the president’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA).

From a document titled, “Corporate Tax Reform and Wages: Theory and Evidence,” on the White House’s website:

“Reducing the statutory federal corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent would, the analysis below suggests, increase average household income in the United States by, very conservatively, $4,000 annually.”

The document goes on to say:

“When we use the more optimistic estimates from the literature, wage boosts are over $9,000 for the average U.S. household.”

No less than Speaker Ryan’s website trumpeted the Council of Economic Advisers report claiming that on average, the proposed corporate tax cuts would result in at least a $4,000 annual increase in wages.

Now, some supporters of the tax bill may say this analysis is unfair because it is too early for the effects of the tax bill to show up in wages. By that logic, they also shouldn’t take credit for reported employment growth increases.  

Still others may point to the $1,000 bonuses announced by some companies shortly after passage of the tax bill. First, that is significantly less than the promised $4,000 to $9,000. Second, these are not wage increases; these are one-time bonuses.

Will companies pay them again, and if so when? Third, the $1,000 represents a fraction of the estimated potential company tax savings.

Using 2016 net income, 2016 effective tax rates, the new 21-percent corporate tax rate and company bonuses, we estimated company bonuses as a percentage of a number of company’s potential tax savings. The results: In many cases, the bonuses represent a mere pittance of the possible tax savings.

Navient announced that it would be giving $1,000 bonuses to 98 percent of its 6,7000 employees, paying out nearly $7 million in bonuses. While that may seem generous, it pales in comparison to Navient’s potential tax savings.

Using Navient’s 2016 net income, its 2016 effective tax rate, estimated annual tax savings of nearly $200 million and its announced bonuses, we calculated that the announced bonuses represent less than 4 percent of Navient’s potential tax savings.

Turning to the airline industry, JetBlue’s employees might be feeling blue if they realized that their $1,000 bonuses are estimated to be less than 10 percent of JetBlue’s potential tax savings, while American Airlines’ bonuses are estimated to represent less than 15 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings

Not to be outdone, Comcast’s bonuses represent less than 8 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings, while Walmart appears downright generous, giving an estimated $0.16 of every dollar of its estimated potential annual tax savings to employees in the form of bonuses.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic 

Source: Solutionomics

What happened to the minimum $4,000 promised? I guess like many promises by politicians, they were empty. Instead, they seem to have gone to share buybacks. For the period December 2017 through February 2018, share buybacks more than doubled to $200 million.

Is a $323 wage increase and a one-time bonus of $1,000 that represents a fraction of estimated potential company tax savings worth the more than $1 trillion in additional debt placed on Americans? Is this the best Congress could do? No.

Instead, Congress could have simply made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company increasing wages. The problem is that some companies receiving tax cuts didn’t raise wages.

If Congress had made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company’s wage increases, the American people would have gotten more bang for their tax cut bucks. Additionally, this would have created a real incentive for companies to raise wages: Increase wages, get a tax cut; don’t and you won’t.

If the justification for saddling the American people with at least $1 trillion in additional debt was greater wage growth, tax cuts should have been tied to each company’s wage growth; that’s just logical. That’s getting a better deal for the American people, and that’s getting a better return on investment.

Chris Macke is the founder of Solutionomics, a think tank focused on developing solutions for a more efficient, merit-based corporate tax code. He has advised the U.S. Federal Reserve by providing market updates and implications of monetary policy changes on asset valuations and market distortions, and he's a contributor to the Fed Beige Book. Find him on Twitter: @solutionomics.

Load Comments (984)
 

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France declassified a report on Saturday laying out evidence that officials said proves that a chemical attack in Syria last week was carried out by the government of President Bashar Assad.

The report claims that several chemical strikes were carried out in the Damascus suburb of Douma on April 7, and that symptoms experienced by the victims — skin burns, suffocation and other breathing difficulties, among other markers — were consistent with the effects of chlorine gas.

"Reliable intelligence indicates that Syrian military officials have coordinated what appears to be the use of chemical weapons containing chlorine on Douma, on April 7," the report, released by the French Foreign Ministry, reads.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report also states that the Syrian government has carried out a number of chemical weapons strikes since April 4, 2017 — the same day a chemical attack in Syria's northern Idlib province left more than 80 civilians dead.

The U.S. issued an assessment on Friday night pointing to the Syrian government's role in the alleged chemical attacks in Douma.

That report cites "multiple media sources, the reported symptoms experienced by victims, videos and images showing two assessed barrel bombs from the attack, and reliable information indicating coordination between Syrian military officials before the attack."

The assessment also suggests that the Syrian government not only used chlorine in the attack on Douma, but that reported symptoms were also consistent with exposure to sarin, a deadly nerve agent.

The French and U.S. assessments came hours after leaders in Washington, Paris and London authorized "precision strikes" on targets in Syria believed to be associated with the country's chemical weapons arsenal.

Syria and its allies, Russia and Iran, have denied that Assad's government used chemical weapons, and have sought to blame both foreign actors and militant groups for staging the attacks in Douma.

Russia has accused the U.S. and its allies of failing to produce adequate evidence of the Syrian government's role in the chemical attack.

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international chemical weapons watchdog, launched an investigation into the alleged chemical strikes on Douma on Saturday.

The allied strikes on Friday were cast by U.S. officials, not as a punishment for Assad's government, but as a means to eradicate Syria's chemical stockpile and production capabilities.

Lt. Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, the director of the Joint Staff, said Saturday that while the allied attacks dealt a blow to Syria's chemical weapons program, Damascus likely retained "residual" elements of its chemical arsenal.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpInfowars' Alex Jones blasts Trump over airstrikes: 'He's crapping all over us' McCain to Trump: Airstrikes alone won't achieve objectives in Syria Top general: US did not notify Russia on Syria targets MORE and other U.S. officials have said that they are prepared to take further action in Syria, unless Assad's government ceases its alleged use of chemical weapons.

Load Comments (254)
 

Mueller can prove Cohen made secret trip to Prague before the election: report

Special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE’s team has proof that President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE’s personal lawyer made a secret trip to Prague during the 2016 campaign despite his denial that he'd ever been there, McClatchy reported Friday.

It is not clear why Michael Cohen was in Prague. The claim he visited was originally made in a dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

Cohen denied that he'd ever been to Prague "in my life" after the dossier's publication, tweeting a photo of his passport.

McClatchy reported that Cohen entered the country through Germany in August or early September 2016, which does not require a passport stamp.

The dossier claimed that, in Prague, Cohen met with a prominent ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Konstantin Kosachev, but it is not clear whether Mueller has evidence of such a meeting.

Koschahev was one of 24 Russian oligarchs slapped with U.S. sanctions earlier this month.

If such a meeting happened, it would be further evidence of ties between Trump associates and Putin. The dossier also claims that Cohen, among others, was deeply involved in a “cover up and damage limitation operation in the attempt to prevent the full details of Trump’s relationship with Russia being exposed.”

Neither Cohen nor Mueller commented on the story to McClatchy.

The report comes on the same day that U.S attorneys confirmed that they are investigating Cohen for criminal activity.

The FBI raided Cohen's office and home on Monday, in part on a referral from Mueller's office. 

 
Quantcast
France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks
READ NEXT: France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

Vedio

Desain G.

vik
Transformasi Wajah KRL

Transformasi Wajah KRL

Ribuan warga Jabodetabek mengandalkan kereta rel listrik (KRL) sebagai moda transportasi massal dalam aktivitas sehari-hari. Pelayanan KRL pun terus dibenahi seiring berjalannya waktu. Simak pembahasan lengkap tentang transformasi wajah KRL dari masa ke m
Hikayat Singkat

Hikayat Singkat

Lahan gambut di Indonesia menyimpan banyak “harta karun” yang salah satunya adalah energi. Namun, eksploitasi secara berlebihan pada lahan gambut akan mengakibatkan stok karbon yang berkurang.
MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017 sudah resmi dimulai! Setelah pada musim sebelumnya banyak momen menarik terjadi, pada tahun ini diyakini akan lebih seru lagi.
Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Refleksi atas warisan nilai Jakob Oetama yang mewarnai perjalanan jurnalisme Indonesia.

Berita Terkini