Rabu, 22 Juli 2026

Andri Elyus Luntungan Mengatakan Pemimpin Dan Warga Dunia Harus Memahami Seperti Apa Kecerdasan Mereka.




Andri News Baru Andri elyus Luntungan Mengatakan banyak warga dunia tidak mau memeriksa seberapa besar kecerdasan otak mereka menurut ukuran para  pakar klinis- seperti Para pakar klinis menilai seseorang disebut cerdas secara intelektual berdasarkan skor IQ (Intelligence Quotient) yang diperoleh melalui instrumen tes standar seperti skala Wechsler (WAIS untuk dewasa, WISC untuk anak-anak). Seseorang dikategorikan cerdas atau Superior jika skornya berada di rentang 120–129, dan sangat superior atau jenius di atas 130.Dalam dunia psikologi klinis, penilaian kecerdasan dilakukan melalui metodologi yang terstruktur dan komprehensif:Tes Baku Klinis: Skor didapatkan melalui serangkaian tes tatap muka yang diawasi langsung oleh psikolog klinis bersertifikat, bukan dari tes daring.Skala Penilaian Baku:90–109: Rata-rata (populasi umum).110–119: Di atas rata-rata.120–129: Cerdas atau Superior.130 ke atas: Sangat Superior / Jenius.Lebih dari Sekadar Angka: Pakar juga melihat kemampuan khusus seperti penalaran verbal, memori kerja, kecepatan pemrosesan informasi, dan pemecahan masalah spasial. Ini perlu bagi warga mengetahuinya sejauh apa dirinya itu.?-Dalam psikologi dan neurosains, ukuran atau volume otak bukanlah penentu utama kecerdasan. Bukti ilmiah menunjukkan korelasi antara ukuran otak dan tingkat kecerdasan (IQ) sangat kecil (sekitar 0,3 hingga 0,4). Kecerdasan lebih ditentukan oleh struktur, konektivitas, dan efisiensi jaringan saraf di dalam otak.Berikut adalah parameter utama kecerdasan dalam psikologi:Efisien Saraf (Neural Efficiency): Otak yang cerdas tidak bekerja lebih keras, melainkan lebih efisien. Mereka menggunakan lebih sedikit energi dan aktivitas sel saraf (glukosa) saat memecahkan masalah dibandingkan rata-rata orang.Konektivitas Antar-Bagian Otak: Kecepatan dan kualitas komunikasi antara otak depan (terkait pengambilan keputusan dan memori) serta bagian lain sangat menentukan kecerdasan seseorang.Kapasitas Working Memory: Ini adalah kemampuan seseorang menyimpan dan mengolah informasi secara sadar dalam waktu singkat. Kapasitas yang lebih tinggi biasanya berkaitan erat dengan skor tes IQ yang lebih baik.Neuroplastisitas: Kemampuan otak untuk tumbuh, membentuk koneksi baru, dan beradaptasi dengan pengalaman atau pembelajaran baru sepanjang hidup.Faktor non-fisik juga memegang peranan krusial, seperti kemampuan beradaptasi dengan lingkungan, penguasaan kecerdasan emosional (EQ), dan kemauan untuk terus belajar. Demikian andri elyus luntungan pengamat international mengatakan kepada jurnalis Liong dari Tiongkok saat dimintai komentarnya mengenai sejauh apa anda melihat orang cerdas dan apa ukuran orang cerdas dimata pengamat. Melaui Hpnya siang ini waktu Tiongkok.
Andri juga menambahkan-Filsafat memandang kecerdasan bukan sekadar kapasitas untuk memproses data, melainkan sebagai perpaduan kompleks antara kesadaran diri (ontologi), metode perolehan pengetahuan (epistemologi), dan kemampuan untuk memahami nilai serta makna dalam kehidupan.Berikut adalah ringkasan bagaimana cabang-cabang filsafat utama memaknai kecerdasan:Epistemologi (Teori Pengetahuan): Memandang kecerdasan sebagai kemampuan manusia untuk merumuskan penalaran (logika) dan menangkap kebenaran, baik secara deduktif maupun induktif, dari pengalaman empiris.Filsafat Pikiran & AI: Mempertanyakan apakah mesin atau Artificial Intelligence (AI) benar-benar memiliki "pemahaman". Tokoh seperti John Searle berpendapat bahwa AI hanyalah manipulasi simbol tanpa kesadaran nyata. Sebaliknya, kaum transhumanis percaya kecerdasan berbasis komputasi dapat melampaui batas biologis manusia.Filsafat Moral & Aksiologi: Menilai bahwa kecerdasan sejati tidak lengkap tanpa kebijaksanaan. Kecerdasan harus diukur dari bagaimana ia diterapkan untuk kebaikan dan mempertimbangkan dampak etis tindakan tersebut.Filsafat Nilai & Spiritualitas: Memandang kecerdasan tertinggi melibatkan kemampuan manusia untuk bergerak digerakkan oleh makna, nilai, dan tujuan hidup, yang membedakannya secara hakiki dari kecerdasan buatan. Ini perlu dipahami bagi warga yang meiliki otak cerdik pandai.! Artinya Kecerdasan Tidak bisa diukur oleh orang Tolol atau orang bodoh atau yang pola pikirnya hanya sngat stndar. artinya, dimana anda disebut orang cerdas dan yang berkata itu orang tolol pertanda tandanya kecerdasan anda dinilai kelasnya si tolol. Ungkap. Andri elyus luntungan, artinya, hak otoritas yang mengatakan anda adalah cerdas harus berdasarkan uji-klinis. "jika ada orang yang mengatakan anda cerdas sambut saja anggap saja bualan sanjungan bagimu.?". Ungkapnya.
Selanjutnya andri elyus luntungan juga menambahkan-Menilai kecerdasan otak bukanlah proses satu dimensi. Strategi terbaik adalah menggunakan pendekatan komprehensif yang mencakup tes formal, evaluasi kemampuan memproses informasi, observasi perilaku sehari-hari, serta pengakuan terhadap keragaman jenis kecerdasan.Berikut adalah strategi efektif yang dapat Anda terapkan untuk menilai tingkat kecerdasan:1. Asesmen Kognitif FormalCara paling terstandarisasi untuk mengukur fungsi mental, memori, penalaran, dan pemahaman bahasa:Tes IQ (Intelligence Quotient): Dilakukan oleh psikolog klinis untuk mendapatkan skor IQ yang terukur.Tes Kecerdasan Majemuk (Multiple Intelligences): Dikembangkan oleh Howard Gardner, metode ini menilai 8 jenis kecerdasan berbeda seperti linguistik, logika-matematika, spasial, musikal, hingga kecerdasan interpersonal dan intrapersonal.2. Pengukuran Kecepatan & Efektivitas BelajarTanda utama kecerdasan adalah kemampuan beradaptasi dan belajar hal baru dengan efektif. Anda dapat mengukurnya melalui:Kecepatan pemahaman: Seberapa cepat seseorang memahami konsep, bahasa, atau keterampilan baru seperti memainkan alat musik atau menguasai program baru.Fleksibilitas kognitif: Kemampuan untuk mengubah cara pandang atau menyesuaikan perilaku saat dihadapkan pada informasi baru atau situasi yang berubah.3. Evaluasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah (Problem Solving)Kecerdasan sering kali terlihat dari bagaimana seseorang menavigasi masalah dan berpikir kritis:Penalaran Logis: Menguji kemampuan melihat pola, menarik kesimpulan dari data, dan menyusun strategi. Gunakan permainan seperti catur, sudoku, atau teka-teki silang sebagai instrumen observasi.Berpikir Kritis: Kemampuan memilah informasi berkualitas di era digital dan menimbang bukti-bukti secara adil tanpa berpikiran sempit.4. Observasi Perilaku dan Kecerdasan Emosional (EQ)Psikolog dan pakar melihat kecerdasan lebih dari sekadar nilai akademik, tetapi juga dari kebiasaan sehari-hari:Keingintahuan yang tinggi: Orang dengan kecerdasan di atas rata-rata cenderung memiliki rasa ingin tahu yang besar dan gemar membaca untuk mencari pengetahuan.Pengendalian emosi yang baik: Kecerdasan emosional memampukan seseorang merespons tantangan, mengelola stres, dan menerima sudut pandang alternatif.Sadar akan batas pengetahuan: Orang cerdas menyadari bahwa pengetahuan mereka masih sedikit dan berani mengakui ketidaktahuan mereka. Maksudnya bagi mereka yang asli otaknya cerdas dia tidak pernah berhenti buat belajar terus mengasah otaknya agar tidak timpul atau hanya sebatas sampai disana kecerdasannya. tutur andri elyus luntungan.
selanjutnya Andri elyus luntungan juga menambahkan-Dalam pandangan matematika, kecerdasan adalah kemampuan untuk berpikir abstrak, sistematis, dan terstruktur dalam mengolah informasi. Hal ini berakar pada kecerdasan logis-matematis (logical-mathematical intelligence), salah satu dari sembilan kecerdasan majemuk.Matematika mendefinisikan dan mengukur kecerdasan melalui lima pilar utama berikut:Pengenalan Pola (Pattern Recognition): Kemampuan untuk melihat keteraturan, merumuskan aturan dari data yang tampaknya acak, dan memprediksi hasil selanjutnya.Penalaran Deduktif & Induktif: Menarik kesimpulan logis yang valid dari premis umum ke khusus (atau sebaliknya) berdasarkan hukum-hukum kepastian.Pemecahan Masalah (Problem Solving): Menilai kecerdasan dari seberapa efektif seseorang mengurai masalah kompleks menjadi langkah-langkah yang lebih kecil, terukur, dan dapat diselesaikan.Pemahaman Abstrak: Kemampuan untuk memanipulasi konsep yang tidak berwujud atau tidak terlihat secara fisik, seperti memahami dimensi ruang, variabel, dan probabilitas.Hubungan Sebab-Akibat: Memahami akar masalah dan memetakan konsekuensi dari setiap tindakan secara logis.Selain itu, matematika melihat bahwa kecerdasan tidak hanya sekadar menghafal rumus atau berhitung cepat, melainkan bagaimana otak membangun "bahasa" internal untuk menavigasi realitas. Ini perlu dipahami setiap warga dunia buat mengasah kecerdasan mereka itu.Dan tidak hanya itu dari segi-Dalam teologi, kecerdasan diukur bukan sekadar dari kapasitas kognitif, melainkan dari kedalaman akal budi \(\text{(nous)}\) dan kematangan spiritual \(\text{(pneumatika)}\). Karunia hikmat \(\text{(sophia/chokmah)}\) dipandang sebagai bentuk kecerdasan tertinggi yang memampukan seseorang memahami kehendak Tuhan, memiliki moralitas yang luhur, dan hidup selaras dengan nilai-nilai ilahi.Teologi mengukur kecerdasan manusia melalui tiga dimensi utama:Kecerdasan Intelektual dan Teoretis: Kemampuan rasional untuk mempelajari firman, mengkaji dogma, dan merenungkan misteri ketuhanan. Hal ini sering disebut sebagai keselarasan antara iman dan akal budi \(\text{(fides\ et\ ratio)}\).Kecerdasan Spiritual \(\text{(Spiritual\ Quotient)}\): Kapasitas untuk peka terhadap Roh Kudus, yang tercermin dalam buah-buah roh seperti kasih, kesabaran, dan penguasaan diri. Ini diukur dari seberapa dalam seseorang mengaplikasikan ajaran agama dalam tindakan kasih sehari-hari terhadap sesama dan lingkungan.Kecerdasan Moral dan Etis: Kemampuan membedakan yang benar dan salah, serta mengambil keputusan bijak yang membawa dampak positif bagi kemaslahatan umat. Artinya apa yang saya katakan diana otak anda cerdas pasti paham mengartikannya apa artinya cerdas itu. Maaf sampai disini dulu ya. penjelasan saya. nanti bisa disambung lagi dilain kesempatan. Demikian Andri elyus luntungan pengamat international mengahiri perkataannya. Ditulis Liong Jurnalis Tiongkok.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar

Desain Andri

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform | TheHill

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform

The latest Employment Situation report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows weekly employee earnings have grown $75 since tax reform passed, well short of the $4,000 to $9,000 annual increases projected by President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE and House Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanTrump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Sunday shows preview: White House officials talk Syria strike Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform MORE (R-Wis.).  

During the three months following passage of the tax bill, the average American saw a $6.21 increase in average weekly earnings. Assuming 12 weeks of work during the three months following passage of the corporate tax cuts, this equates to a $75 increase.

Assuming a full 52 weeks of work, the $6.21 increase in weekly earnings would result in a $323 annual increase, nowhere near the minimum $4,000 promised and $9,000 potential annual increases projected by President Trump and Speaker Ryan if significant cuts were made to corporate tax rates.

Unless something drastically changes, it seems that Americans are going to have to settle for much less than the $4,000 to $9,000 projected wage increases. An extra $322 a year isn’t going to do much to pay down the $1 trillion in additional debt they are projected to take on as a result of the tax cuts.

Yet, a key part of the argument for the recently passed corporate tax cuts and more than a trillion dollars in debt was the substantial wage hike promised by the president’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA).

From a document titled, “Corporate Tax Reform and Wages: Theory and Evidence,” on the White House’s website:

“Reducing the statutory federal corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent would, the analysis below suggests, increase average household income in the United States by, very conservatively, $4,000 annually.”

The document goes on to say:

“When we use the more optimistic estimates from the literature, wage boosts are over $9,000 for the average U.S. household.”

No less than Speaker Ryan’s website trumpeted the Council of Economic Advisers report claiming that on average, the proposed corporate tax cuts would result in at least a $4,000 annual increase in wages.

Now, some supporters of the tax bill may say this analysis is unfair because it is too early for the effects of the tax bill to show up in wages. By that logic, they also shouldn’t take credit for reported employment growth increases.  

Still others may point to the $1,000 bonuses announced by some companies shortly after passage of the tax bill. First, that is significantly less than the promised $4,000 to $9,000. Second, these are not wage increases; these are one-time bonuses.

Will companies pay them again, and if so when? Third, the $1,000 represents a fraction of the estimated potential company tax savings.

Using 2016 net income, 2016 effective tax rates, the new 21-percent corporate tax rate and company bonuses, we estimated company bonuses as a percentage of a number of company’s potential tax savings. The results: In many cases, the bonuses represent a mere pittance of the possible tax savings.

Navient announced that it would be giving $1,000 bonuses to 98 percent of its 6,7000 employees, paying out nearly $7 million in bonuses. While that may seem generous, it pales in comparison to Navient’s potential tax savings.

Using Navient’s 2016 net income, its 2016 effective tax rate, estimated annual tax savings of nearly $200 million and its announced bonuses, we calculated that the announced bonuses represent less than 4 percent of Navient’s potential tax savings.

Turning to the airline industry, JetBlue’s employees might be feeling blue if they realized that their $1,000 bonuses are estimated to be less than 10 percent of JetBlue’s potential tax savings, while American Airlines’ bonuses are estimated to represent less than 15 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings

Not to be outdone, Comcast’s bonuses represent less than 8 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings, while Walmart appears downright generous, giving an estimated $0.16 of every dollar of its estimated potential annual tax savings to employees in the form of bonuses.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic 

Source: Solutionomics

What happened to the minimum $4,000 promised? I guess like many promises by politicians, they were empty. Instead, they seem to have gone to share buybacks. For the period December 2017 through February 2018, share buybacks more than doubled to $200 million.

Is a $323 wage increase and a one-time bonus of $1,000 that represents a fraction of estimated potential company tax savings worth the more than $1 trillion in additional debt placed on Americans? Is this the best Congress could do? No.

Instead, Congress could have simply made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company increasing wages. The problem is that some companies receiving tax cuts didn’t raise wages.

If Congress had made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company’s wage increases, the American people would have gotten more bang for their tax cut bucks. Additionally, this would have created a real incentive for companies to raise wages: Increase wages, get a tax cut; don’t and you won’t.

If the justification for saddling the American people with at least $1 trillion in additional debt was greater wage growth, tax cuts should have been tied to each company’s wage growth; that’s just logical. That’s getting a better deal for the American people, and that’s getting a better return on investment.

Chris Macke is the founder of Solutionomics, a think tank focused on developing solutions for a more efficient, merit-based corporate tax code. He has advised the U.S. Federal Reserve by providing market updates and implications of monetary policy changes on asset valuations and market distortions, and he's a contributor to the Fed Beige Book. Find him on Twitter: @solutionomics.

Load Comments (984)
 

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France declassified a report on Saturday laying out evidence that officials said proves that a chemical attack in Syria last week was carried out by the government of President Bashar Assad.

The report claims that several chemical strikes were carried out in the Damascus suburb of Douma on April 7, and that symptoms experienced by the victims — skin burns, suffocation and other breathing difficulties, among other markers — were consistent with the effects of chlorine gas.

"Reliable intelligence indicates that Syrian military officials have coordinated what appears to be the use of chemical weapons containing chlorine on Douma, on April 7," the report, released by the French Foreign Ministry, reads.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report also states that the Syrian government has carried out a number of chemical weapons strikes since April 4, 2017 — the same day a chemical attack in Syria's northern Idlib province left more than 80 civilians dead.

The U.S. issued an assessment on Friday night pointing to the Syrian government's role in the alleged chemical attacks in Douma.

That report cites "multiple media sources, the reported symptoms experienced by victims, videos and images showing two assessed barrel bombs from the attack, and reliable information indicating coordination between Syrian military officials before the attack."

The assessment also suggests that the Syrian government not only used chlorine in the attack on Douma, but that reported symptoms were also consistent with exposure to sarin, a deadly nerve agent.

The French and U.S. assessments came hours after leaders in Washington, Paris and London authorized "precision strikes" on targets in Syria believed to be associated with the country's chemical weapons arsenal.

Syria and its allies, Russia and Iran, have denied that Assad's government used chemical weapons, and have sought to blame both foreign actors and militant groups for staging the attacks in Douma.

Russia has accused the U.S. and its allies of failing to produce adequate evidence of the Syrian government's role in the chemical attack.

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international chemical weapons watchdog, launched an investigation into the alleged chemical strikes on Douma on Saturday.

The allied strikes on Friday were cast by U.S. officials, not as a punishment for Assad's government, but as a means to eradicate Syria's chemical stockpile and production capabilities.

Lt. Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, the director of the Joint Staff, said Saturday that while the allied attacks dealt a blow to Syria's chemical weapons program, Damascus likely retained "residual" elements of its chemical arsenal.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpInfowars' Alex Jones blasts Trump over airstrikes: 'He's crapping all over us' McCain to Trump: Airstrikes alone won't achieve objectives in Syria Top general: US did not notify Russia on Syria targets MORE and other U.S. officials have said that they are prepared to take further action in Syria, unless Assad's government ceases its alleged use of chemical weapons.

Load Comments (254)
 

Mueller can prove Cohen made secret trip to Prague before the election: report

Special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE’s team has proof that President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE’s personal lawyer made a secret trip to Prague during the 2016 campaign despite his denial that he'd ever been there, McClatchy reported Friday.

It is not clear why Michael Cohen was in Prague. The claim he visited was originally made in a dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

Cohen denied that he'd ever been to Prague "in my life" after the dossier's publication, tweeting a photo of his passport.

McClatchy reported that Cohen entered the country through Germany in August or early September 2016, which does not require a passport stamp.

The dossier claimed that, in Prague, Cohen met with a prominent ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Konstantin Kosachev, but it is not clear whether Mueller has evidence of such a meeting.

Koschahev was one of 24 Russian oligarchs slapped with U.S. sanctions earlier this month.

If such a meeting happened, it would be further evidence of ties between Trump associates and Putin. The dossier also claims that Cohen, among others, was deeply involved in a “cover up and damage limitation operation in the attempt to prevent the full details of Trump’s relationship with Russia being exposed.”

Neither Cohen nor Mueller commented on the story to McClatchy.

The report comes on the same day that U.S attorneys confirmed that they are investigating Cohen for criminal activity.

The FBI raided Cohen's office and home on Monday, in part on a referral from Mueller's office. 

 
Quantcast
France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks
READ NEXT: France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

Vedio

Desain G.

vik
Transformasi Wajah KRL

Transformasi Wajah KRL

Ribuan warga Jabodetabek mengandalkan kereta rel listrik (KRL) sebagai moda transportasi massal dalam aktivitas sehari-hari. Pelayanan KRL pun terus dibenahi seiring berjalannya waktu. Simak pembahasan lengkap tentang transformasi wajah KRL dari masa ke m
Hikayat Singkat

Hikayat Singkat

Lahan gambut di Indonesia menyimpan banyak “harta karun” yang salah satunya adalah energi. Namun, eksploitasi secara berlebihan pada lahan gambut akan mengakibatkan stok karbon yang berkurang.
MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017 sudah resmi dimulai! Setelah pada musim sebelumnya banyak momen menarik terjadi, pada tahun ini diyakini akan lebih seru lagi.
Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Refleksi atas warisan nilai Jakob Oetama yang mewarnai perjalanan jurnalisme Indonesia.

Berita Terkini