Selasa, 21 Juli 2026

Andri Elyus Luntungan Mengatakan Jangan Mengukur Cinta Sejati Hanya Dari Biologis Dan Materi

 



Andri News Baru Andri elyus Luntungan Menilai Banyak orang yang bercinta seringkali hanya Bicara biologis atau harta, atau melihat tampanya atau cantik saja, atau melihat kegumannya, atau melihat sangat menariknya dirinya. Atau melihat harta dan kedudukan jabatannya. Atau Tahta singgah sana jika itu yang sedang terjadi dalam kehidupan cinta anda setidaknya mudah pudar dan mudah rapuh- cinta sejatti seharusnya dilihat dari  berbagai aspeck. Dalam filsafat, mencintai dipahami sebagai tindakan aktif dan kekuatan penyatuan untuk mencapai keutuhan, pertumbuhan, dan kebijaksanaan, bukan sekadar emosi pasif. Filsuf Yunani kuno mengkategorikannya menjadi tiga jenis: Eros (hasrat/cinta romantis), Philia (persahabatan), dan Agape (cinta tanpa syarat atau welas asih kemanusiaan).Mari kita telaah lebih dalam bagaimana konsep ini dipahami:Erich Fromm (Seni Mencintai): Menulis bahwa mencintai adalah sebuah seni yang membutuhkan pengetahuan, usaha, dan komitmen. Cinta bukanlah sesuatu yang "jatuh" begitu saja, melainkan tindakan memberi diri secara aktif untuk menumbuhkan kehidupan dan kebahagiaan orang lain.Platonisme (Plato): Memandang cinta sebagai dorongan jiwa (Eros) untuk mencari keindahan dan kebenaran tertinggi. Melalui cinta pada satu objek, manusia terdorong untuk mencapai bentuk cinta yang lebih murni dan universal.Eksistensialisme (Jean-Paul Sartre): Memberikan perspektif kritis di mana mencintai adalah upaya untuk menegaskan kebebasan dan pengakuan dari orang lain, meski sering kali diwarnai oleh konflik ego.Sebagai bukti betapa sentralnya konsep ini, kata Filsafat sendiri secara etimologi berasal dari bahasa Yunani Kuno Phileo (berarti cinta) dan Sophia (kebijaksanaan). Para filsuf adalah para pencinta kebijaksanaan. Artinya dalam bercinta disana para filisuf melihatnya seperti itu.
 Demikian Andri elyus luntungan pengamat international menjawab Meskipun dirinya harusnya tidak perlu menjawab mengenai pertanyaan mengenai masalah Cintai. Namun dengan rendah hati Beliau menjawab saat dimintai pandangannya mengenai cinta, oleh jurnalis Vionita dari spanyol melalui sambungan Hpnya malam ini.
Andri elyus luntungan menambahkan-Andri Elyus Luntungan berpendapat Dalam psikologi, cinta tidak lagi dianggap sekadar misteri atau sekadar perasaan abstrak. Cinta dinilai melalui komponen rasional, emosional, dan biologis yang membentuk keterikatan antar manusia. Para ahli menggunakan pendekatan ilmiah untuk mengukur kualitas, bentuk, hingga kedewasaan sebuah hubungan.Berikut adalah pilar-pilar utama bagaimana psikologi membedah dan menilai cinta:Teori Segitiga Cinta (Triangular Theory of Love)Dikembangkan oleh Robert Sternberg, teori ini adalah kerangka kerja paling populer untuk mengukur cinta. Cinta yang matang dan ideal dinilai dari tiga elemen seimbang yang disebut Consummate Love:Keintiman (Intimacy): Kedekatan emosional, keterbukaan untuk saling bercerita, dan rasa saling percaya.Gairah (Passion): Ketertarikan fisik, hasrat seksual, dan dorongan biologis untuk bersama.Komitmen (Commitment): Keputusan sadar secara kognitif untuk mempertahankan hubungan jangka panjang, terlepas dari naik-turunnya emosi.Berdasarkan ketiga elemen ini, psikolog bisa memetakan apakah suatu hubungan hanya berupa Infatuation (gairah sesaat tanpa komitmen) atau Companionate Love (komitmen dan kedekatan emosional tanpa gairah).Lima Bahasa Cinta (The 5 Love Languages)Dipelopori oleh Dr. Gary Chapman, pendekatan ini menilai bagaimana seseorang mengekspresikan dan menerima cinta. Psikolog sering menggunakannya untuk memperbaiki masalah komunikasi:Waktu Berkualitas (Quality Time): Menghadirkan perhatian penuh bersama pasangan.Kata-kata Penegasan (Words of Affirmation): Kebutuhan untuk mendengar pujian, apresiasi, atau dukungan verbal.Menerima Hadiah (Receiving Gifts): Menilai cinta dari usaha dan pemikiran di balik sebuah pemberian.Pelayanan (Acts of Service): Membantu meringankan beban pasangan melalui tindakan nyata.Sentuhan Fisik (Physical Touch): Kebutuhan akan kedekatan fisik seperti berpegangan tangan atau pelukan.Teori Keterikatan (Attachment Theory)Penilaian psikologis juga melihat bagaimana pola asuh masa kecil membentuk cara seseorang mencintai pasangannya. Gaya keterikatan ini terbagi menjadi empat:Aman (Secure): Mampu membangun hubungan yang sehat, percaya diri, dan terbuka.Cemas (Anxious): Takut ditinggalkan, membutuhkan validasi terus-menerus, dan mudah cemas.Menghindar (Avoidant): Menghindari keintiman emosional, merasa tidak nyaman saat hubungan terlalu dekat.Cemas-Menghindar (Fearful-Avoidant): Ingin dicintai namun takut terluka sehingga sering mendorong pasangan menjauh.Indikator Hubungan Sehat vs. Beracun (Toxic)Dalam menilai sebuah relasi, psikolog lebih fokus pada kesehatan mental individu di dalamnya. Cinta yang sehat dinilai dari:Kesetaraan dan Penghargaan: Saling menghargai batasan (boundaries), perbedaan pendapat, dan privasi masing-masing.Dukungan: Pasangan saling mendukung untuk bertumbuh dan berkembang menjadi versi terbaik diri mereka.Rasa Aman Emosional: Hubungan yang bebas dari manipulasi, ancaman, atau intimidasi psikologis.Penilaian Biologis (Sains di Balik Cinta)Secara neurologis, jatuh cinta memicu reaksi kimia di otak. Otak melepaskan hormon dopamin (hormon kebahagiaan/euforia), oksitosin (hormon keterikatan dan kasih sayang), dan adrenalin (yang membuat jantung berdebar-debar). Seiring berjalannya waktu, gairah yang intens (passionate love) akan menurun, dan digantikan oleh cinta yang lebih tenang (companionate love) yang didorong oleh rasa kepedulian yang mendalam. Cetus Andri elyus luntungan. Selanjutnya Andri elyus luntungan menambahkan.Strategi cinta yang efektif berpusat pada keseimbangan antara mengenal diri sendiri, komunikasi terbuka, dan membangun koneksi secara bertahap. Alih-alih manipulasi, strategi yang sehat berfokus pada kejujuran, saling menghargai, dan menciptakan rasa aman untuk menumbuhkan hubungan yang kuat.Fondasi Strategi Cinta yang SehatUntuk membangun atau memperbaiki hubungan, ada beberapa langkah utama yang bisa Anda terapkan:Kenali Diri Sendiri: Sebelum menjalin hubungan dengan orang lain, pastikan Anda memahami batasan, nilai hidup, dan apa yang Anda cari dari seorang pasangan.Komunikasi Terbuka dan Jujur: Sampaikan kebutuhan, ketakutan, dan harapan Anda dengan jelas. Hindari menebak-nebak perasaan pasangan.Membangun Kenangan Baru: Jika Anda sedang menyalakan kembali api cinta, buatlah aktivitas atau pengalaman baru yang menyenangkan bersama pasangan.Memberikan Perhatian Khusus: Ungkapkan rasa cinta melalui tindakan nyata, seperti memberikan pujian, meluangkan waktu berkualitas (quality time), atau melakukan hal kecil yang dia sukai.Membagi Diri Secara Perlahan: Saat baru mengenal seseorang, jangan ceritakan seluruh hidup Anda sekaligus. Cetus andri elyus luntungan startegi Bercinta.
Andri elyus luntungan juga menambahkan-Biologi dan metafisika memandang cinta dari dua kutub yang saling melengkapi: biologi melihatnya sebagai mekanisme fisik-kimiawi untuk reproduksi dan bertahan hidup, sedangkan metafisika memandangnya sebagai realitas spiritual transenden yang menghubungkan kesadaran dan hakikat jiwa manusia.1. Cinta dalam Pandangan Biologi (Sains dan Evolusi)Dari kacamata sains, cinta adalah proses neurobiologis yang rumit. Jutaan sel saraf, hormon, dan neurotransmitter bekerja sama untuk menciptakan perasaan keterikatan dan gairah.Zat Kimiawi Otak: Saat jatuh cinta, tubuh membanjiri otak dengan dopamin (hormon kenikmatan/euforia), norepinefrin (hormon pemicu detak jantung cepat), dan oksitosin (hormon kelekatan/rasa percaya).Fungsi Evolusi: Secara psikologi evolusioner, cinta berevolusi agar manusia terikat satu sama lain sehingga keturunan dapat bertahan hidup dan dirawat dengan baik.Daya Tarik Fisik: Proses ini dipicu oleh feromon dan pengenalan bawah sadar akan potensi pasangan yang sehat secara genetik. Inilah yang perlu setiap mereka yang bercinta pahami. apa artinya jatuh cinta dan apa dalam cinta yang mereka sedang mau gapai itu.Hanya ini yang dapat saya katakan demikian andri elyus luntungan mengahiri perkataannya. Ditulis Vionita jurnali spanyol.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar

Desain Andri

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform | TheHill

Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform

The latest Employment Situation report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows weekly employee earnings have grown $75 since tax reform passed, well short of the $4,000 to $9,000 annual increases projected by President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE and House Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanTrump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Sunday shows preview: White House officials talk Syria strike Wage growth well short of what was promised from tax reform MORE (R-Wis.).  

During the three months following passage of the tax bill, the average American saw a $6.21 increase in average weekly earnings. Assuming 12 weeks of work during the three months following passage of the corporate tax cuts, this equates to a $75 increase.

Assuming a full 52 weeks of work, the $6.21 increase in weekly earnings would result in a $323 annual increase, nowhere near the minimum $4,000 promised and $9,000 potential annual increases projected by President Trump and Speaker Ryan if significant cuts were made to corporate tax rates.

Unless something drastically changes, it seems that Americans are going to have to settle for much less than the $4,000 to $9,000 projected wage increases. An extra $322 a year isn’t going to do much to pay down the $1 trillion in additional debt they are projected to take on as a result of the tax cuts.

Yet, a key part of the argument for the recently passed corporate tax cuts and more than a trillion dollars in debt was the substantial wage hike promised by the president’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA).

From a document titled, “Corporate Tax Reform and Wages: Theory and Evidence,” on the White House’s website:

“Reducing the statutory federal corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent would, the analysis below suggests, increase average household income in the United States by, very conservatively, $4,000 annually.”

The document goes on to say:

“When we use the more optimistic estimates from the literature, wage boosts are over $9,000 for the average U.S. household.”

No less than Speaker Ryan’s website trumpeted the Council of Economic Advisers report claiming that on average, the proposed corporate tax cuts would result in at least a $4,000 annual increase in wages.

Now, some supporters of the tax bill may say this analysis is unfair because it is too early for the effects of the tax bill to show up in wages. By that logic, they also shouldn’t take credit for reported employment growth increases.  

Still others may point to the $1,000 bonuses announced by some companies shortly after passage of the tax bill. First, that is significantly less than the promised $4,000 to $9,000. Second, these are not wage increases; these are one-time bonuses.

Will companies pay them again, and if so when? Third, the $1,000 represents a fraction of the estimated potential company tax savings.

Using 2016 net income, 2016 effective tax rates, the new 21-percent corporate tax rate and company bonuses, we estimated company bonuses as a percentage of a number of company’s potential tax savings. The results: In many cases, the bonuses represent a mere pittance of the possible tax savings.

Navient announced that it would be giving $1,000 bonuses to 98 percent of its 6,7000 employees, paying out nearly $7 million in bonuses. While that may seem generous, it pales in comparison to Navient’s potential tax savings.

Using Navient’s 2016 net income, its 2016 effective tax rate, estimated annual tax savings of nearly $200 million and its announced bonuses, we calculated that the announced bonuses represent less than 4 percent of Navient’s potential tax savings.

Turning to the airline industry, JetBlue’s employees might be feeling blue if they realized that their $1,000 bonuses are estimated to be less than 10 percent of JetBlue’s potential tax savings, while American Airlines’ bonuses are estimated to represent less than 15 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings

Not to be outdone, Comcast’s bonuses represent less than 8 percent of its estimated potential annual tax savings, while Walmart appears downright generous, giving an estimated $0.16 of every dollar of its estimated potential annual tax savings to employees in the form of bonuses.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic 

Source: Solutionomics

What happened to the minimum $4,000 promised? I guess like many promises by politicians, they were empty. Instead, they seem to have gone to share buybacks. For the period December 2017 through February 2018, share buybacks more than doubled to $200 million.

Is a $323 wage increase and a one-time bonus of $1,000 that represents a fraction of estimated potential company tax savings worth the more than $1 trillion in additional debt placed on Americans? Is this the best Congress could do? No.

Instead, Congress could have simply made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company increasing wages. The problem is that some companies receiving tax cuts didn’t raise wages.

If Congress had made each company’s tax cut contingent on each company’s wage increases, the American people would have gotten more bang for their tax cut bucks. Additionally, this would have created a real incentive for companies to raise wages: Increase wages, get a tax cut; don’t and you won’t.

If the justification for saddling the American people with at least $1 trillion in additional debt was greater wage growth, tax cuts should have been tied to each company’s wage growth; that’s just logical. That’s getting a better deal for the American people, and that’s getting a better return on investment.

Chris Macke is the founder of Solutionomics, a think tank focused on developing solutions for a more efficient, merit-based corporate tax code. He has advised the U.S. Federal Reserve by providing market updates and implications of monetary policy changes on asset valuations and market distortions, and he's a contributor to the Fed Beige Book. Find him on Twitter: @solutionomics.

Load Comments (984)
 

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

France declassified a report on Saturday laying out evidence that officials said proves that a chemical attack in Syria last week was carried out by the government of President Bashar Assad.

The report claims that several chemical strikes were carried out in the Damascus suburb of Douma on April 7, and that symptoms experienced by the victims — skin burns, suffocation and other breathing difficulties, among other markers — were consistent with the effects of chlorine gas.

"Reliable intelligence indicates that Syrian military officials have coordinated what appears to be the use of chemical weapons containing chlorine on Douma, on April 7," the report, released by the French Foreign Ministry, reads.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report also states that the Syrian government has carried out a number of chemical weapons strikes since April 4, 2017 — the same day a chemical attack in Syria's northern Idlib province left more than 80 civilians dead.

The U.S. issued an assessment on Friday night pointing to the Syrian government's role in the alleged chemical attacks in Douma.

That report cites "multiple media sources, the reported symptoms experienced by victims, videos and images showing two assessed barrel bombs from the attack, and reliable information indicating coordination between Syrian military officials before the attack."

The assessment also suggests that the Syrian government not only used chlorine in the attack on Douma, but that reported symptoms were also consistent with exposure to sarin, a deadly nerve agent.

The French and U.S. assessments came hours after leaders in Washington, Paris and London authorized "precision strikes" on targets in Syria believed to be associated with the country's chemical weapons arsenal.

Syria and its allies, Russia and Iran, have denied that Assad's government used chemical weapons, and have sought to blame both foreign actors and militant groups for staging the attacks in Douma.

Russia has accused the U.S. and its allies of failing to produce adequate evidence of the Syrian government's role in the chemical attack.

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international chemical weapons watchdog, launched an investigation into the alleged chemical strikes on Douma on Saturday.

The allied strikes on Friday were cast by U.S. officials, not as a punishment for Assad's government, but as a means to eradicate Syria's chemical stockpile and production capabilities.

Lt. Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, the director of the Joint Staff, said Saturday that while the allied attacks dealt a blow to Syria's chemical weapons program, Damascus likely retained "residual" elements of its chemical arsenal.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpInfowars' Alex Jones blasts Trump over airstrikes: 'He's crapping all over us' McCain to Trump: Airstrikes alone won't achieve objectives in Syria Top general: US did not notify Russia on Syria targets MORE and other U.S. officials have said that they are prepared to take further action in Syria, unless Assad's government ceases its alleged use of chemical weapons.

Load Comments (254)
 

Mueller can prove Cohen made secret trip to Prague before the election: report

Special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE’s team has proof that President TrumpDonald John TrumpRobert De Niro, Ben Stiller play Mueller and Cohen in 'SNL' parody of 'Meet the Parents' Trump order targets wide swath of public assistance programs Comey says Trump reacted to news of Russian meddling by asking if it changed election results MORE’s personal lawyer made a secret trip to Prague during the 2016 campaign despite his denial that he'd ever been there, McClatchy reported Friday.

It is not clear why Michael Cohen was in Prague. The claim he visited was originally made in a dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

Cohen denied that he'd ever been to Prague "in my life" after the dossier's publication, tweeting a photo of his passport.

McClatchy reported that Cohen entered the country through Germany in August or early September 2016, which does not require a passport stamp.

The dossier claimed that, in Prague, Cohen met with a prominent ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Konstantin Kosachev, but it is not clear whether Mueller has evidence of such a meeting.

Koschahev was one of 24 Russian oligarchs slapped with U.S. sanctions earlier this month.

If such a meeting happened, it would be further evidence of ties between Trump associates and Putin. The dossier also claims that Cohen, among others, was deeply involved in a “cover up and damage limitation operation in the attempt to prevent the full details of Trump’s relationship with Russia being exposed.”

Neither Cohen nor Mueller commented on the story to McClatchy.

The report comes on the same day that U.S attorneys confirmed that they are investigating Cohen for criminal activity.

The FBI raided Cohen's office and home on Monday, in part on a referral from Mueller's office. 

 
Quantcast
France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks
READ NEXT: France issues report detailing evidence of Assad role in chemical attacks

Vedio

Desain G.

vik
Transformasi Wajah KRL

Transformasi Wajah KRL

Ribuan warga Jabodetabek mengandalkan kereta rel listrik (KRL) sebagai moda transportasi massal dalam aktivitas sehari-hari. Pelayanan KRL pun terus dibenahi seiring berjalannya waktu. Simak pembahasan lengkap tentang transformasi wajah KRL dari masa ke m
Hikayat Singkat

Hikayat Singkat

Lahan gambut di Indonesia menyimpan banyak “harta karun” yang salah satunya adalah energi. Namun, eksploitasi secara berlebihan pada lahan gambut akan mengakibatkan stok karbon yang berkurang.
MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017

MotoGP 2017 sudah resmi dimulai! Setelah pada musim sebelumnya banyak momen menarik terjadi, pada tahun ini diyakini akan lebih seru lagi.
Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Jakob Oetama The Legacy

Refleksi atas warisan nilai Jakob Oetama yang mewarnai perjalanan jurnalisme Indonesia.

Berita Terkini